I read a man asserting, propaganda was ineffective for this reason: it does not change how a person feels. I think he means, showered with propaganda, he will keep his mouth shut but retain his feelings.
Do you agree?
Also, if he is right, how would this affect society?
I think the experience in communist countreies shows that once propaganda becomes ubiquitous, people see it and learn to work around it because they have to. Independent journalist, Matt Taibi tells a story about being in Soviet era Russia. His Russian roomate came in with a copy of Pravda and he asked him what was in the news and the guy laughed and said he didnt get if for the news--he got it use as extra insulation in his coat.
Would propaganda also include what stories are amplified and how they’re edited or presented?
If so, a crack in the illusion, where reality doesn’t match the message, will cause distrust and feelings of betrayal.
“Showered with propaganda, he will keep his mouth shut but retain his feelings.”
This promotes self censorship.
But if the propaganda is pervasive, people self censor, what does this mean for the next generations, intellectually? Is IQ relative (to the tests created to test it) or is it dependent on an environment that fosters or quells conditions for higher IQ/functioning (maybe these are two different things).
Maybe I mean creativity and problem-solving vs IQ…
Here, people offer guesses as to who is running the United States. hint - no one knows.